In each procedure the medical and the theological questions are kept apart: doctors establish what happened and whether medicine can account for it, and the Church judges what it means. For a healing in a saint's cause the medical board asks whether the recovery was rapid, complete, lasting and scientifically unexplained. Regulations issued in 2016 for the board allow a case to be examined no more than three times.

The Lourdes procedure, in which the international committee may find a cure "medically unexplained in the current state of scientific knowledge" before a bishop decides, is set out step by step in the answer on the recognized miracles of Lourdes.

The 2024 Norms add that Church authorities will not, as a rule, declare an apparition or similar phenomenon supernatural; the most favourable ordinary outcome is a nihil obstat permitting devotion. Of such phenomena the Norms say that "the faithful are not obliged to give an assent of faith to them." The answer on how approval of apparition sites works lists the six possible outcomes.

A claim's popularity is not a judgment of the Church. What counts is what the competent authority has actually declared, and about what.